Import buildroot 2016.02.01
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
From 754897490d9478025d174c2b1c1849305f728324 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
|
||||
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:13:07 +0100
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] libsecret.pc: add Libs.private field for libgcrypt
|
||||
|
||||
When libgcrypt is available, libsecret links with it. When dynamic
|
||||
linking is used, there is no problem: libsecret.so has a NEEDED
|
||||
pointing to libgcrypt, so linking an application with -lsecret works
|
||||
fine. However, when doing static linking, you must specify the entire
|
||||
chain of libraries, otherwise you get unresolved symbols errors, such
|
||||
as:
|
||||
|
||||
host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot/usr/lib/libsecret-1.a(libsecret_1_la-secret-session.o): In function `request_open_session_aes':
|
||||
build/libsecret-0.18.3/libsecret/secret-session.c:99: undefined reference to `gcry_mpi_release'
|
||||
build/libsecret-0.18.3/libsecret/secret-session.c:101: undefined reference to `gcry_mpi_aprint'
|
||||
build/libsecret-0.18.3/libsecret/secret-session.c:107: undefined reference to `gcry_free'
|
||||
|
||||
In order to solve this, we simply need to indicate in the Libs.private
|
||||
field of the .pc file that we depend on libgcrypt.
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
|
||||
---
|
||||
libsecret/libsecret.pc.in | 1 +
|
||||
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/libsecret/libsecret.pc.in b/libsecret/libsecret.pc.in
|
||||
index 0c342ef..d99cf44 100644
|
||||
--- a/libsecret/libsecret.pc.in
|
||||
+++ b/libsecret/libsecret.pc.in
|
||||
@@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ Description: GObject bindings for Secret Service API
|
||||
Version: @VERSION@
|
||||
Requires: glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 gio-2.0
|
||||
Libs: -L${libdir} -lsecret-@SECRET_MAJOR@
|
||||
+Libs.private: @LIBGCRYPT_LIBS@
|
||||
Cflags: -I${includedir}/libsecret-@SECRET_MAJOR@
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.6.4
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user